<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Won&#8217;t somebody please think of the children!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/</link>
	<description>Taking back the bridge one troll at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 03:22:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucina Mastella</title>
		<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucina Mastella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialscapegoat.com/?p=169#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Venancio</title>
		<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Venancio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialscapegoat.com/?p=169#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging. I added it to my favorites blog site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my site as well and let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging. I added it to my favorites blog site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my site as well and let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klara Dorcelus</title>
		<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Klara Dorcelus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialscapegoat.com/?p=169#comment-455</guid>
		<description>You seem very knowledgable about this issue and it shows. Trust all your future posts turn out as well. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem very knowledgable about this issue and it shows. Trust all your future posts turn out as well. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suziwong66</title>
		<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Suziwong66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialscapegoat.com/?p=169#comment-125</guid>
		<description>what you are espousing is called &#039;philosophy for children&#039; where children are taught rational logical thinking and higher level thinking e.g. analysis, comparison etc..(Blooms revised taxonomy is one of a few theories).

Some schools and even universities are advocating this program. Checkout Sue Knight at UniSA who along with her academic peers have recently launched a philosophy for kids association that educates educators how to deliver this content which is currently not taught by every Australian teacher.

Philosophy for children has been around for a few decades...check out Matthew Lipman&#039;s work, however it appears that the Australian public education system is happy for Australian children to go through life being blissfully ignorant in the skills of rational logical argument as such ways of thinking like relativism are still alive and kicking and are not specifically targeted in curriculum frameworks! Philosophy for childen and ethics have only been included in teacher preparation courses in more recent times, but trying to get preservice teachers to &#039;take it on&#039; when it isn&#039;t mandated within the curriculum framework is a fight in itself.

Yes, i want my children to be literate and numerate, but i also want them to THINK rationally and logically.

So, in short i&#039;m with you...what we need to do is get the great philosophy/ethics programs that are out there for children into the curriculum framework as a mandated curriculum area instead of leaving it up the will of individual schools or teachers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what you are espousing is called &#8216;philosophy for children&#8217; where children are taught rational logical thinking and higher level thinking e.g. analysis, comparison etc..(Blooms revised taxonomy is one of a few theories).</p>
<p>Some schools and even universities are advocating this program. Checkout Sue Knight at UniSA who along with her academic peers have recently launched a philosophy for kids association that educates educators how to deliver this content which is currently not taught by every Australian teacher.</p>
<p>Philosophy for children has been around for a few decades&#8230;check out Matthew Lipman&#8217;s work, however it appears that the Australian public education system is happy for Australian children to go through life being blissfully ignorant in the skills of rational logical argument as such ways of thinking like relativism are still alive and kicking and are not specifically targeted in curriculum frameworks! Philosophy for childen and ethics have only been included in teacher preparation courses in more recent times, but trying to get preservice teachers to &#8216;take it on&#8217; when it isn&#8217;t mandated within the curriculum framework is a fight in itself.</p>
<p>Yes, i want my children to be literate and numerate, but i also want them to THINK rationally and logically.</p>
<p>So, in short i&#8217;m with you&#8230;what we need to do is get the great philosophy/ethics programs that are out there for children into the curriculum framework as a mandated curriculum area instead of leaving it up the will of individual schools or teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tige</title>
		<link>http://socialscapegoat.com/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Tige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialscapegoat.com/?p=169#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Good. Kids need to spend more time doing nothing. Always with the stress and the doing stuff since you are a kid. What&#039;s the point of learning all stuff? How much does anybody remember or utilise from school or university?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. Kids need to spend more time doing nothing. Always with the stress and the doing stuff since you are a kid. What&#39;s the point of learning all stuff? How much does anybody remember or utilise from school or university?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

